Premium
Free‐breathing pediatric MRI with nonrigid motion correction and acceleration
Author(s) -
Cheng Joseph Y.,
Zhang Tao,
Ruangwattanapaisarn Nichanan,
Alley Marcus T.,
Uecker Martin,
Pauly John M.,
Lustig Michael,
Vasanawala Shreyas S.
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
journal of magnetic resonance imaging
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.563
H-Index - 160
eISSN - 1522-2586
pISSN - 1053-1807
DOI - 10.1002/jmri.24785
Subject(s) - image quality , nuclear medicine , medicine , magnetic resonance imaging , wilcoxon signed rank test , diaphragm (acoustics) , cohen's kappa , breathing , radiology , computer science , artificial intelligence , mathematics , statistics , image (mathematics) , physics , anatomy , acoustics , loudspeaker , mann–whitney u test
Purpose To develop and assess motion correction techniques for high‐resolution pediatric abdominal volumetric magnetic resonance images acquired free‐breathing with high scan efficiency. Materials and Methods First, variable‐density sampling and radial‐like phase‐encode ordering were incorporated into the 3D Cartesian acquisition. Second, intrinsic multichannel butterfly navigators were used to measure respiratory motion. Lastly, these estimates are applied for both motion‐weighted data‐consistency in a compressed sensing and parallel imaging reconstruction, and for nonrigid motion correction using a localized autofocusing framework. With Institutional Review Board approval and informed consent/assent, studies were performed on 22 consecutive pediatric patients. Two radiologists independently scored the images for overall image quality, degree of motion artifacts, and sharpness of hepatic vessels and the diaphragm. The results were assessed using paired Wilcoxon test and weighted kappa coefficient for interobserver agreements. Results The complete procedure yielded significantly better overall image quality (mean score of 4.7 out of 5) when compared to using no correction (mean score of 3.4, P < 0.05) and to using motion‐weighted accelerated imaging (mean score of 3.9, P < 0.05). With an average scan time of 28 seconds, the proposed method resulted in comparable image quality to conventional prospective respiratory‐triggered acquisitions with an average scan time of 91 seconds (mean score of 4.5). Conclusion With the proposed methods, diagnosable high‐resolution abdominal volumetric scans can be obtained from free‐breathing data acquisitions. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2015;42:407–420.