z-logo
Premium
T1 bias in chemical shift‐encoded liver fat‐fraction: Role of the flip angle
Author(s) -
Kühn JensPeter,
Jahn Christina,
Hernando Diego,
Siegmund Werner,
Hadlich Stefan,
Mayerle Julia,
Pfannmöller Jörg,
Langner Sonke,
Reeder Scott
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
journal of magnetic resonance imaging
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.563
H-Index - 160
eISSN - 1522-2586
pISSN - 1053-1807
DOI - 10.1002/jmri.24457
Subject(s) - flip angle , confounding , nuclear medicine , linear regression , nuclear magnetic resonance , analytical chemistry (journal) , magnetic resonance imaging , chemistry , medicine , mathematics , statistics , physics , radiology , chromatography
Purpose To investigate flip angle (FA)‐dependent T1 bias in chemical shift‐encoded fat‐fraction (FF) and to evaluate a strategy for correcting this bias to achieve accurate MRI‐based estimates of liver fat with optimized signal‐to‐noise ratio (SNR). Materials and Methods Thirty‐three obese patients, 14 men/19 women, aged 57.3 ± 13.9 years underwent 3 Tesla (T) liver MRI including MR‐spectroscopy and four three‐echo‐complex chemical shift‐encoded MRI sequences using different FAs (1°/3°/10°/20°). FF was estimated with R2* correction and multi‐peak fat spectral modeling. The FF for each FA with and without T1 correction was compared with spectroscopy as a reference standard, using linear regression. Relative SNR of the magnitude data were assessed for each flip angle. Results The correlation between chemical shift‐encoded MRI and spectroscopy was high (R 2 ≈ 0.9). Without T1 correction, the agreement of both techniques showed no significant differences in slope ( P FlipAngle1 °  = 0.385/ P FlipAngle3 °  = 0.289) using low FA. High FA resulted in significant different slopes ( P FlipAngle10 °  = 0.016/ P FlipAngle20 °  = 0.014. T1 bias was successfully corrected using the T1 correction strategy (slope: P FlipAngle10 °  = 0.387/ P FlipAngle20 °  = 0.440). Additionally, the use of high FA (near the Ernst angle) improved the SNR of the magnitude data ( FA1 vs. FA3; respectively FA1 vs. FA10 P  ≤ 0.001). Conclusion T1 bias is a strong confounder in the assessment of liver fat using chemical shift imaging with high FA. However, using a larger flip angle with T1 correction leads to higher SNR, and residual error after T1 correction is very small. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2014;40:875–883 . © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc .

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom