Premium
Diffusion kurtosis imaging study of prostate cancer: Preliminary findings
Author(s) -
Tamura Chiharu,
Shinmoto Hiroshi,
Soga Shigeyoshi,
Okamura Teppei,
Sato Hiroki,
Okuaki Tomoyuki,
Pang Yuxi,
Kosuda Shigeru,
Kaji Tatsumi
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
journal of magnetic resonance imaging
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.563
H-Index - 160
eISSN - 1522-2586
pISSN - 1053-1807
DOI - 10.1002/jmri.24379
Subject(s) - prostate cancer , medicine , kurtosis , receiver operating characteristic , effective diffusion coefficient , prostate , hyperplasia , prostatectomy , urology , diffusion mri , stromal cell , cancer , nuclear medicine , radiology , magnetic resonance imaging , pathology , mathematics , statistics
Purpose To evaluate the differences in parameters of diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI) between prostate cancer, benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), and benign peripheral zone (PZ). Materials and Methods Twenty‐four foci of prostate cancer, 41 BPH nodules (14 stromal and 27 nonstromal hyperplasia), and 20 benign PZ from 20 patients who underwent radical prostatectomy were investigated. Diffusion‐weighted imaging (DWI) was performed using 11 b‐values (0–1500 s/mm 2 ). DKI model relates DWI signal decay to parameters that reflect non‐Gaussian diffusion coefficient ( D ) and deviations from normal distribution ( K ). A mixed model analysis of variance and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses were performed to assess the statistical significance of the metrics of DKI and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC). Results K was significantly higher in prostate cancer and stromal BPH than in benign PZ (1.19 ± 0.24 and 0.99 ± 0.28 versus 0.63 ± 0.23, P < 0.001 and P < 0.001, respectively). K showed a trend toward higher levels in prostate cancer than in stromal BPH (1.19 ± 0.24 versus 0.99 ± 0.28, P = 0.051). On the ROC analyses, a significant difference in area under the curve was not observed between K and ADC, however, K showed the highest sensitivity among three parameters. Conclusion DKI may contribute to the imaging diagnosis of prostate cancer, especially in the differential diagnosis of prostate cancer and BPH. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2014;40:723–729 . © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc .