Premium
Automatic quantification of subcutaneous and visceral adipose tissue from whole‐body magnetic resonance images suitable for large cohort studies
Author(s) -
Wald Diana,
Teucher Birgit,
Dinkel Julien,
Kaaks Rudolf,
Delorme Stefan,
Boeing Heiner,
Seidensaal Katharina,
Meinzer HansPeter,
Heimann Tobias
Publication year - 2012
Publication title -
journal of magnetic resonance imaging
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.563
H-Index - 160
eISSN - 1522-2586
pISSN - 1053-1807
DOI - 10.1002/jmri.23775
Subject(s) - adipose tissue , magnetic resonance imaging , subcutaneous adipose tissue , medicine , segmentation , whole body imaging , nuclear medicine , radiology , computer science , artificial intelligence
Purpose: To develop an automated method with which to distinguish metabolically different adipose tissues in a large number of subjects using whole‐body magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) datasets for improving the understanding of chronic disease risk predictions associated with distinct adipose tissue compartments. Materials and Methods: In all, 314 participants were scanned using a 1.5T MRI‐scanner with a 2‐point Dixon whole‐body sequence. Image segmentation was automated using standard image processing techniques and knowledge‐based methods. Abdominal adipose tissue was separated into subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT) and visceral adipose tissue (VAT) by statistical shape models. Bone marrow was removed to provide a more accurate measurement of adipose tissue. To assess segmentation accuracy, ground‐truth segmentations in 52 images were performed manually by one operator. Due to the high effort of manual delineation, manual segmentation was limited to seven slices per volume. Results: Volumetric differences were 3.30 ± 2.97% and 6.22 ± 5.28% for SAT and VAT, respectively. The systematic error shows an overestimation of 4.22 ± 7.01% for VAT and 0.37 ± 4.45% for SAT. Coefficients‐of‐variation from repeated measurements were: 3.50 ± 2.93% for VAT and 0.35 ± 0.26% for SAT. The approach of removing bone marrow worked well in most body regions. Only occasionally the method failed for knees and/or shinbone, which resulted in an overestimation of SAT by 3.14 ± 1.45%. Conclusion: We developed a fully automatic process to assess SAT and VAT in whole‐body MRI data. The method can support epidemiological studies investigating the relationship between excess body fat and chronic diseases. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2012; 36:1421–1434. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.