Premium
Quantification of hepatic macrosteatosis in living, related liver donors using T1‐independent, T2*‐corrected chemical shift MRI
Author(s) -
Joe Eugene,
Lee Jeong Min,
Kim Kyung Won,
Lee Kyung Bun,
Kim Soo Jin,
Baek Jee Hyun,
Shin Cheong Il,
Suh Kyung Suk,
Yi Nam Joon,
Han Joon Koo,
Choi Byung Ihn
Publication year - 2012
Publication title -
journal of magnetic resonance imaging
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.563
H-Index - 160
eISSN - 1522-2586
pISSN - 1053-1807
DOI - 10.1002/jmri.23738
Subject(s) - medicine , magnetic resonance imaging , steatosis , histopathology , diagnostic accuracy , nuclear medicine , radiology , pathology , gastroenterology
Purpose: To evaluate the diagnostic implications of the iterative decomposition of water and fat using echo‐asymmetry and the least‐squares estimation (IDEAL) technique to detect hepatic steatosis (HS) in potential liver donors using histopathology as the reference standard. Materials and Methods: Forty‐nine potential liver donors (32 male, 17 female; mean age, 31.7 years) were included. All patients were imaged using the in‐ and out‐of‐phase (IOP) gradient‐echo (GRE) and IDEAL techniques on a 1.5 T MR scanner. To estimate the hepatic fat fraction (FF), two reviewers performed regions‐of‐interest measurement in 15 areas of the liver seen on the IOP images and on the IDEAL‐FF images. The magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and pathology values of macrosteatosis were correlated using the Pearson correlation coefficient. We analyzed the diagnostic performance of IOP imaging and IDEAL for detecting HS. Results: The results of the hepatic‐FF estimated on IDEAL were well correlated with the histologic degree of macrosteatosis (γ = 0.902, P < 0.001). IDEAL showed 100% sensitivity and 91% specificity for detecting HS, and IOP imaging showed 87.5% sensitivity and 97% specificity, respectively. Conclusion: IDEAL is a useful tool for the preoperative diagnosis of HS in potential living liver donors; it can also help to avoid unnecessary biopsies in these patients. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2012;36:1124–1130. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.