z-logo
Premium
Pharmacokinetic analysis based on dynamic contrast‐enhanced MRI for evaluating tumor response to preoperative therapy for oral cancer
Author(s) -
Chikui Toru,
Kitamoto Erina,
Kawano Shintaro,
Sugiura Tsuyoshi,
Obara Makoto,
Simonetti Arjan W.,
Hatakenaka Masamitsu,
Matsuo Yoshio,
Koga Shoichi,
Ohga Masahiro,
Nakamura Katsumasa,
Yoshiura Kazunori
Publication year - 2012
Publication title -
journal of magnetic resonance imaging
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.563
H-Index - 160
eISSN - 1522-2586
pISSN - 1053-1807
DOI - 10.1002/jmri.23704
Subject(s) - medicine , pharmacokinetics , magnetic resonance imaging , dynamic contrast , nuclear medicine , chemoradiotherapy , cancer , radiology
Purpose: To evaluate whether a pharmacokinetic analysis is useful for monitoring the response of oral cancer to chemoradiotherapy (CRT). Materials and Methods: Twenty‐nine patients were included. They underwent dynamic contrast‐enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE‐MRI) before and after CRT. The DCE‐MRI data were analyzed using a Tofts and Kermode (TK) model. The histological evaluation of the effects of CRT was performed according to Ohboshi and Shimosato's classification. Results: None of the pre‐CRT parameters were significantly different between the responders and nonresponders. The post‐CRT volume of the extravascular extracellular space (EES) per unit volume of tissue (v e ) of responders (0.397 ± 0.080) was higher than that of nonresponders (0.281 ± 0.076) ( P = 0.01). The change of the v e between the pre‐ and post‐CRT of the responders (0.154 ± 0.093) was larger than that of the nonresponders (0.033 ± 0.073) ( P = 0.001). Therefore, the increase in the v e strongly suggested a good tumor response to CRT, which reflected an increase of the EES secondary to the destruction of the cancer nest. The changes in the volume transfer constant (K trans ) were significantly different between the responders and nonresponders ( P = 0.018). Conclusion: Both the increase of the v e and the elevation of permeability (K trans ) were indicative of a good tumor response to CRT. The pharmacokinetic analysis had potential for monitoring the histopathological response to CRT. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2012;36:589–597. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom