Premium
Improved B 1 homogeneity of 3 tesla breast MRI using dual‐source parallel radiofrequency excitation
Author(s) -
Rahbar Habib,
Partridge Savannah C.,
DeMartini Wendy B.,
Gutierrez Robert L.,
Parsian Sana,
Lehman Constance D.
Publication year - 2012
Publication title -
journal of magnetic resonance imaging
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.563
H-Index - 160
eISSN - 1522-2586
pISSN - 1053-1807
DOI - 10.1002/jmri.23571
Subject(s) - excitation , homogeneity (statistics) , nuclear medicine , medicine , nuclear magnetic resonance , physics , mathematics , statistics , quantum mechanics
Purpose: To compare breast MRI B 1 homogeneity at 3 Tesla (T) with and without dual‐source parallel radiofrequency (RF) excitation. Materials and Methods: After institutional review board approval, we evaluated 14 consecutive breast MR examinations performed at 3T that included three‐dimensional B 1 maps created separately with conventional single‐source and dual‐source parallel RF excitation techniques. We measured B 1 values (expressed as % of intended B 1 ) on each B 1 map at nipple level in multiple bilateral locations: anterior, lateral, central, medial, and posterior. Mean whole breast and location specific B 1 values were calculated and compared between right and left breasts using paired t‐test. Results: Mean whole breast B 1 values differed significantly between right and left breasts with standard single‐source RF excitation (difference L‐R, Δ = 9.2%; P < 0.001) but not with dual‐source parallel RF excitation (Δ = 2.3%; P = 0.085). Location specific B 1 values differed significantly between right and left on single‐source in the lateral ( P = 0.014), central ( P = 0.0001), medial ( P = 0.0013), and posterior ( P < 0.0001) locations. Conversely, mean B 1 values differed significantly on dual‐source parallel RF excitation for only the anterior ( P = 0.030) and lateral ( P = 0.0003) locations. Conclusion: B 1 homogeneity is improved with dual‐source parallel RF excitation on 3T breast MRI when compared with standard single‐source RF excitation technique. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2012;35:1222‐1226. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.