z-logo
Premium
Automated quantification of muscle and fat in the thigh from water‐, fat‐, and nonsuppressed MR images
Author(s) -
Makrogiannis Sokratis,
Serai Suraj,
Fishbein Kenneth W.,
Schreiber Catherine,
Ferrucci Luigi,
Spencer Richard G.
Publication year - 2012
Publication title -
journal of magnetic resonance imaging
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.563
H-Index - 160
eISSN - 1522-2586
pISSN - 1053-1807
DOI - 10.1002/jmri.22842
Subject(s) - magnetic resonance imaging , voxel , thigh , computed tomography , materials science , computer science , biomedical engineering , medicine , radiology , artificial intelligence , anatomy
Purpose: To introduce and validate an unsupervised muscle and fat quantification algorithm based on joint analysis of water‐suppressed (WS), fat‐suppressed (FS), and water and fat (nonsuppressed) volumetric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the mid‐thigh region. Materials and Methods: We first segmented the subcutaneous fat by use of a parametric deformable model, then applied centroid clustering in the feature domain defined by the voxel intensities in WS and FS images to identify the intermuscular fat and muscle. In the final step we computed volumetric and area measures of fat and muscle. We applied this algorithm on datasets of water‐, fat‐, and nonsuppressed volumetric MR images acquired from 28 participants. Results: We validated our tissue composition analysis against fat and muscle area measurements obtained from semimanual analysis of single‐slice mid‐thigh computed tomography (CT) images of the same participants and found very good agreement between the two methods. Furthermore, we compared the proposed approach with a variant that uses nonsuppressed images only and observed that joint analysis of WS and FS images is more accurate than the nonsuppressed only variant. Conclusion: Our MRI algorithm produces accurate tissue quantification, is less labor‐intensive, and more reproducible than the original CT‐based workflow and can address interparticipant anatomic variability and intensity inhomogeneity effects. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2012;35:1152‐1161. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here