z-logo
Premium
Effect of scanner in longitudinal studies of brain volume changes
Author(s) -
Takao Hidemasa,
Hayashi Naoto,
Ohtomo Kuni
Publication year - 2011
Publication title -
journal of magnetic resonance imaging
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.563
H-Index - 160
eISSN - 1522-2586
pISSN - 1053-1807
DOI - 10.1002/jmri.22636
Subject(s) - scanner , voxel , nuclear medicine , volume (thermodynamics) , brain size , mathematics , medicine , physics , magnetic resonance imaging , computer science , radiology , artificial intelligence , quantum mechanics
Abstract Purpose: To evaluate the effects of drift in scanner hardware and inter‐scanner variability on global and regional brain volume changes using longitudinal data obtained on two scanners of the exact same model. Materials and Methods: A total of 208 subjects (70 females and 138 males, mean age = 56.5 ± 10.1 years) were scanned twice, at an interval of approximately 2 years (mean interval = 1.9 ± 0.15 years), using two 3.0 Tesla (T) scanners of the exact same model. The subjects were divided into four groups according to the combination of scanners used. The effects of scanner drift and inter‐scanner variability on global and regional brain volume changes were evaluated using voxel‐based morphometry (VBM) and structural image evaluation using normalization of atrophy (SIENA). Results: The mean whole brain volume calculated using VBM increased by 17.2 ± 29.3 mL, and the changes were significantly different between groups. The mean percentage brain volume change (PBVC) calculated using SIENA was −0.46 ± 0.71 %, and did not differ between groups. VBM showed several regions with a significant increase or decrease in volume; however, SIENA showed that edge displacement values were negative in most regions. Conclusion: Even with scanners of the exact same model, scanner drift, and inter‐scanner variability can cancel out actual longitudinal brain volume change. SIENA, which corrects for differences in imaging geometry using the outer skull surface for both time points, can reduce the effects of scanner drift and inter‐scanner variability on longitudinal morphometric results. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2011;. © 2011 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here