z-logo
Premium
Practical signal‐to‐noise ratio quantification for sensitivity encoding: Application to coronary MR angiography
Author(s) -
Yu Jing,
Agarwal Harsh,
Stuber Matthias,
Schär Michael
Publication year - 2011
Publication title -
journal of magnetic resonance imaging
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.563
H-Index - 160
eISSN - 1522-2586
pISSN - 1053-1807
DOI - 10.1002/jmri.22571
Subject(s) - imaging phantom , signal to noise ratio (imaging) , noise (video) , signal (programming language) , image noise , contrast to noise ratio , biomedical engineering , medicine , nuclear medicine , image quality , computer science , artificial intelligence , image (mathematics) , telecommunications , programming language
Purpose: To develop and evaluate a practical method for the quantification of signal‐to‐noise ratio (SNR) on coronary MR angiograms (MRA) acquired with parallel imaging. Materials and Methods: To quantify the spatially varying noise due to parallel imaging reconstruction, a new method has been implemented incorporating image data acquisition followed by a fast noise scan during which radiofrequency pulses, cardiac triggering and navigator gating are disabled. The performance of this method was evaluated in a phantom study where SNR measurements were compared with those of a reference standard (multiple repetitions). Subsequently, SNR of myocardium and posterior skeletal muscle was determined on in vivo human coronary MRA. Results: In a phantom, the SNR measured using the proposed method deviated less than 10.1% from the reference method for small geometry factors (≤2). In vivo, the noise scan for a 10 min coronary MRA acquisition was acquired in 30 s. Higher signal and lower SNR, due to spatially varying noise, were found in myocardium compared with posterior skeletal muscle. Conclusion: SNR quantification based on a fast noise scan is a validated and easy‐to‐use method when applied to three‐dimensional coronary MRA obtained with parallel imaging as long as the geometry factor remains low. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2011;33:1330–1340. © 2011 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here