z-logo
Premium
Intracranial tumor response to respiratory challenges at 3.0 T: Impact of different methods to quantify changes in the MR relaxation rate R2*
Author(s) -
Müller Andreas,
Remmele Stefanie,
Wenningmann Ingobert,
Clusmann Hans,
Träber Frank,
Flacke Sebastian,
König Roy,
Gieseke Jürgen,
Willinek Winfried A.,
Schild Hans H.,
Mürtz Petra
Publication year - 2010
Publication title -
journal of magnetic resonance imaging
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.563
H-Index - 160
eISSN - 1522-2586
pISSN - 1053-1807
DOI - 10.1002/jmri.22205
Subject(s) - voxel , subtraction , magnetic resonance imaging , temporal resolution , relaxation (psychology) , nuclear medicine , nuclear magnetic resonance , sensitivity (control systems) , radiology , medicine , physics , mathematics , arithmetic , quantum mechanics , electronic engineering , engineering
Purpose: To compare two ΔR2* quantification methods for analyzing the response of intracranial tumors to different breathing gases. The determination of changes in the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) relaxation rate R2* (ΔR2*), induced by hyperoxic and hypercapnic respiratory challenges, enables the noninvasive assessment of blood oxygenation changes and vasoreactivity. Materials and Methods: Sixteen patients with various intracranial tumors were examined at 3.0 T. The response to respiratory challenges was registered using a dynamic multigradient‐echo sequence with high temporal and spatial resolution. At each dynamic step, ΔR2* was derived in two different ways: 1) by subtraction of R2* values obtained from monoexponential decay functions, 2) by computing ΔR2* echo‐wise from signal intensity ratios. The sensitivity for detection of responding voxels and the behavior of the “global” response were investigated. Results: Significantly more responding voxels (about 4%) were found for method (1). The “global” response was independent from the chosen quantification method but showed slightly larger changes (about 6%) when ΔR2* was derived from method (1). Conclusion: Similar results were observed for the two methods, with a slightly higher detection sensitivity of responding voxels when ΔR2* was obtained from monoexponential approximation. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2010;32:17–23. © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom