Premium
Perfusion parameters derived from bolus‐tracking perfusion imaging are immune to tracer recirculation
Author(s) -
Kosior Jayme Cameron,
Frayne Richard
Publication year - 2010
Publication title -
journal of magnetic resonance imaging
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.563
H-Index - 160
eISSN - 1522-2586
pISSN - 1053-1807
DOI - 10.1002/jmri.22052
Subject(s) - mean transit time , tracer , perfusion , cerebral blood flow , bolus (digestion) , nuclear medicine , blood flow , perfusion scanning , biomedical engineering , computer science , medicine , physics , cardiology , nuclear physics
Abstract Purpose: To investigate the impact of tracer recirculation on estimates of cerebral blood flow (CBF), cerebral blood volume (CBV), and mean transit time (MTT). Materials and Methods: The theoretical model used to derive CBF, CBV, and MTT was examined. CBF and CBV estimates with and without tracer recirculation were compared in computer simulations to examine the effects of tracer recirculation. Results: The equations used to derive CBF, CBV, and MTT assume that the arterial input function and tissue tracer signals define the input and output signals, respectively, of a linear time‐invariant system. As a result of the principle of superposition, these perfusion parameters are immune to tracer recirculation, which was confirmed by computer simulation. However, limited acquisition durations can lead to CBV and CBF errors of up to 50%. Conclusion: Tracer recirculation does not impact estimation of CBF, CBV, or MTT. However, previous approaches used to remove recirculation effects may be beneficial when used to compensate for limited acquisition durations in which the passage of the bolus is not adequately captured. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2010;31:753–756. © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.