Premium
Reproducibility of 3.0 Tesla magnetic resonance spectroscopy for measuring hepatic fat content
Author(s) -
van Werven Jochem R.,
Hoogduin Johannes M.,
Nederveen Aart J.,
van Vliet Andre A.,
Wajs Ewa,
Vandenberk Petra,
Stroes Erik S.G.,
Stoker Jaap
Publication year - 2009
Publication title -
journal of magnetic resonance imaging
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.563
H-Index - 160
eISSN - 1522-2586
pISSN - 1053-1807
DOI - 10.1002/jmri.21837
Subject(s) - reproducibility , intraclass correlation , coefficient of variation , repeatability , chemistry , nuclear medicine , nuclear magnetic resonance , magnetic resonance imaging , analytical chemistry (journal) , medicine , chromatography , radiology , physics
Purpose To investigate reproducibility of proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy ( 1 H‐MRS) to measure hepatic triglyceride content (HTGC). Materials and Methods In 24 subjects, HTGC was evaluated using 1 H‐MRS at 3.0 Tesla. We studied “between‐weeks” reproducibility and reproducibility of 1 H‐MRS in subjects with fatty liver. We also studied within liver variability and within day reproducibility. Reproducibility was assessed by coefficient of variation (CV), repeatability coefficient (RC), and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Results The CV of between weeks reproducibility was 9.5%, with a RC of 1.3% HTGC (ICC 0.998). The CV in fatty livers was 4.1%, with a RC of 1.3% HTGC (ICC 0.997). Within day CV was 4.5%, with a RC of 0.4% HTGC (ICC 0.999). CV for within liver variability was 14.5%. Conclusion Reproducibility of 1 H‐MRS to measure HTGC for “between‐weeks” measurements and in fatty livers is high, which is important for follow‐up studies. Within liver variability displays a larger variation, meaning that liver fat is not equally distributed and during consecutive measurements the same voxel position should be used. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2009;30:444–448. © 2009 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.