z-logo
Premium
Non‐contrast‐enhanced MR angiography for selective visualization of the hepatic vein and inferior vena cava with true steady‐state free‐precession sequence and time‐spatial labeling inversion pulses: Preliminary results
Author(s) -
Shimada Kotaro,
Isoda Hiroyoshi,
Okada Tomohisa,
Kamae Toshikazu,
Maetani Yoji,
Arizono Shigeki,
Hirokawa Yuusuke,
Shibata Toshiya,
Togashi Kaori
Publication year - 2009
Publication title -
journal of magnetic resonance imaging
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.563
H-Index - 160
eISSN - 1522-2586
pISSN - 1053-1807
DOI - 10.1002/jmri.21636
Subject(s) - steady state free precession imaging , medicine , image quality , radiology , inferior vena cava , nuclear medicine , visualization , precession , superior vena cava , abdomen , portal vein , vein , magnetic resonance imaging , physics , computer science , surgery , computer vision , artificial intelligence , image (mathematics) , astronomy
Purpose To selectively visualize the hepatic vein and inferior vena cava (IVC) using three‐dimensional (3D) true steady‐state free‐precession (SSFP) MR angiography with time‐spatial labeling inversion pulse (T‐SLIP), and to optimize the acquisition protocol. Materials and Methods Respiratory‐gated 3D true SSFP scans were conducted in 23 subjects in combination with two different T‐SLIPs (one placed in the thorax to suppress the arterial signal and the other in the abdomen to suppress the portal venous signal). One of the most important factors was the inversion time (TI) of abdominal T‐SLIP, and the image quality was evaluated at four different TIs of 800, 1200, 1600, and 2000 msec in terms of relative signal‐to‐noise ratio (SNR), contrast‐to‐noise ratio (CNR), and mean visualization scores. Results No significant difference was observed in SNR and CNR between each TI. However, IVC visualization scores were better at TIs of 1600 and 2000 msec, and overall image quality was better at TIs of 1200 and 1600 msec. Therefore, the TI of 1600 msec was considered to provide the optimal balance between IVC visualization and signal suppression of the portal vein in our protocol. Conclusion True SSFP scan with T‐SLIPs enabled selective visualization of the hepatic vein and IVC without an exogenous contrast agent. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2009;29:474–479. © 2009 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here