Premium
In vitro investigation of pacemaker lead heating induced by magnetic resonance imaging: Role of implant geometry
Author(s) -
Calcagnini Giovanni,
Triventi Michele,
Censi Federica,
Mattei Eugenio,
Bartolini Pietro,
Kainz Wolfgang,
Bassen Howard I.
Publication year - 2008
Publication title -
journal of magnetic resonance imaging
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.563
H-Index - 160
eISSN - 1522-2586
pISSN - 1053-1807
DOI - 10.1002/jmri.21536
Subject(s) - magnetic resonance imaging , lead (geology) , implant , materials science , nuclear magnetic resonance , in vitro , medicine , biomedical engineering , chemistry , radiology , geology , physics , surgery , geomorphology , biochemistry
Purpose To evaluate the effect of the geometry of implantable pacemakers (PMs) on lead heating induced by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Materials and Methods In vitro experiments were conducted with two different setups, using fluoroptic probes to measure the temperature increase. The first experiment consisted of a rectangular box filled with a gelled saline and a pacemaker with its leads. This box was exposed in an MRI birdcage coil to a sinusoidal 64‐MHz field with a calibrated whole‐body specific absorption rate (WB‐SAR) of 1 W/kg. The highest SAR and temperature increase (3000 W/kg, 12°C) occurred for the implant configuration having the largest area. The second experimental setup consisted of a human‐shaped torso filled with gelled saline. In this setup the PM and its lead were exposed to a real MRI scanner, using clinical sequences with WB‐SAR up to 2 W/kg. Results We found that higher heating occurs for configurations with longer exposed lead lengths and that right chest PMs showed the highest temperature and local SAR (11.9°C, 2345 W/kg), whereas the left chest PMs were less heated (6.3°C, 1362 W/kg). Implant geometry, exposed lead length, and lead area must be considered in the wide variation of temperature increases induced by MRI. Conclusions The amount of MRI‐induced lead tip heating depends strongly on implant geometry, particularly the lead area, exposed lead length, and position of the implant in the phantom. Critical lead tip heating was found for the longer leads. Therefore, to minimize MRI‐induced lead tip heating, the PM lead should be as short as possible. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2008;28:879–886. © 2008 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.