Premium
Impact of heart rate variability in patients with normal sinus rhythm on image quality in coronary magnetic angiography
Author(s) -
Tangcharoen Tarinee,
Jahnke Cosima,
Koehler Uwe,
Schnackenburg Bernhard,
Klein Christoph,
Fleck Eckart,
Nagel Eike
Publication year - 2008
Publication title -
journal of magnetic resonance imaging
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.563
H-Index - 160
eISSN - 1522-2586
pISSN - 1053-1807
DOI - 10.1002/jmri.21426
Subject(s) - medicine , image quality , heart rate variability , heart rate , magnetic resonance imaging , cardiology , coronary artery disease , sinus rhythm , radiology , image (mathematics) , atrial fibrillation , artificial intelligence , blood pressure , computer science
Purpose To evaluate the influence of heart rate variability on image quality in patients with suspected coronary artery disease during magnetic resonance coronary angiography (MRCA). Materials and Methods The coronary images from 70 patients who underwent target‐volume MRA were retrospectively analyzed. Two independent observers evaluated image quality using a score from 0 (nonvisible) to 4 (excellent quality). Images were grouped into good (score > 2) and poor image quality (score 0–2). Five parameters (effective scan duration, navigator efficiency, mean heart rate, acquisition window, and heart rate variability) were evaluated. Results In all, 56 of the 70 patients (80%) were scored as good and 14 as poor image quality. Only the navigator efficiency, heart rate variability, and acquisition window showed statistically significant for the prediction of image quality, with navigator efficiency being the strongest predictor. Subgroup analysis showed that patients with navigator efficiency >60% had good image quality independent of the heart rate variability. In patients with navigator efficiency ≤60%, heart rate variability is the only remaining significant parameter ( P = 0.03). Conclusion Navigator efficiency was the most important predictor of MRCA image quality. Heart rate variability is the most important predictor of image quality in patients with a navigator efficiency ≤60%. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2008;28:74–79. © 2008 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.