z-logo
Premium
Minimum detectable change in motor and prefrontal cortex activity over repeated sessions using 3T functional MRI and a block design
Author(s) -
Goodyear Bradley G.,
Douglas Erin A.
Publication year - 2008
Publication title -
journal of magnetic resonance imaging
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.563
H-Index - 160
eISSN - 1522-2586
pISSN - 1053-1807
DOI - 10.1002/jmri.21347
Subject(s) - functional magnetic resonance imaging , voxel , prefrontal cortex , working memory , magnetic resonance imaging , block design , neuroimaging , motor cortex , repeated measures design , psychology , medicine , cognition , computer science , neuroscience , artificial intelligence , mathematics , radiology , statistics , combinatorics , stimulation
Abstract Purpose To determine the minimum detectable change (MDC) in functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) measurements of brain activity over repeated sessions with 95% confidence using a block design of tasks. Materials and Methods Fourteen individuals participated in three sessions on different days during which four scans each of a motor task and working memory task were performed. Using a region‐of‐interest analysis of variance, we calculated the MDC in the volume of activated primary sensorimotor cortex (for motor) and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (for working memory), as well as the percent increase in MR signal and the center and location of maxima of the activated voxels. Results The MDC of activated volume was 5.0–8.8 cm 3 , and the MDC of percent increase in signal from baseline during tasks was 0.3%–0.6%. The MDC of the center of mass of activity was 3–4 mm, compared to 6–10 mm for the location of maxima. Conclusion fMRI measurements that quantify the strength of activity in response to tasks and centers of mass offer sensitive measurements of change over repeated imaging sessions. fMRI can be used for serial investigations of individual participants using simple motor and cognitive tasks using a simple block design. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2008;28:1055–1060. © 2008 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here