z-logo
Premium
Measuring local RF heating in MRI: Simulating perfusion in a perfusionless phantom
Author(s) -
Akca Imran B.,
Ferhanoglu Onur,
Yeung Christopher J.,
Guney Sevin,
Tasci T. Onur,
Atalar Ergin
Publication year - 2007
Publication title -
journal of magnetic resonance imaging
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.563
H-Index - 160
eISSN - 1522-2586
pISSN - 1053-1807
DOI - 10.1002/jmri.21161
Subject(s) - imaging phantom , biomedical engineering , scanner , materials science , perfusion , dielectric heating , steady state (chemistry) , in vivo , temperature measurement , nuclear medicine , nuclear magnetic resonance , physics , medicine , radiology , chemistry , optics , thermodynamics , optoelectronics , microbiology and biotechnology , biology , dielectric
Purpose To overcome conflicting methods of local RF heating measurements by proposing a simple technique for predicting in vivo temperature rise by using a gel phantom experiment. Materials and Methods In vivo temperature measurements are difficult to conduct reproducibly; fluid phantoms introduce convection, and gel phantom lacks perfusion. In the proposed method the local temperature rise is measured in a gel phantom at a timepoint that the phantom temperature would be equal to the perfused body steady‐state temperature value. The idea comes from the fact that the steady‐state temperature rise in a perfused body is smaller than the steady‐state temperature increase in a perfusionless phantom. Therefore, when measuring the temperature on a phantom there will be the timepoint that corresponds to the perfusion time constant of the body part. Results The proposed method was tested with several phantom and in vivo experiments. Instead, an overall average of 30.8% error can be given as the amount of underestimation with the proposed method. This error is within the variability of in vivo experiments (45%). Conclusion With the aid of this reliable temperature rise prediction the amount of power delivered by the scanner can be controlled, enabling safe MRI examinations of patients with implants. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2007;26:1228–1235. © 2007 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here