z-logo
Premium
Variability in RF‐induced heating of a deep brain stimulation implant across MR systems
Author(s) -
Baker Kenneth B.,
Tkach Jean A.,
Phillips Micheal D.,
Rezai Ali R.
Publication year - 2006
Publication title -
journal of magnetic resonance imaging
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.563
H-Index - 160
eISSN - 1522-2586
pISSN - 1053-1807
DOI - 10.1002/jmri.20769
Subject(s) - specific absorption rate , imaging phantom , electromagnetic coil , implant , torso , head (geology) , nuclear medicine , biomedical engineering , materials science , human head , radiofrequency coil , magnetic resonance imaging , electrical conductor , nuclear magnetic resonance , physics , medicine , absorption (acoustics) , computer science , geology , radiology , anatomy , surgery , telecommunications , quantum mechanics , geomorphology , antenna (radio) , composite material
Purpose To compare the MRI‐related heating per unit of specific absorption rate (SAR) profile of a conductive implant between two 1.5‐Tesla/64 MHz MR systems using a transmit/receive (t/r) head coil configuration. Materials and Methods Deep brain stimulation (DBS) leads were configured within a gel‐filled phantom of the human head and torso. Temperature variation at each of four contacts of the bilaterally‐placed leads was monitored using fluoroptic thermometry. MRI was performed using the t/r head coils of two different‐generation 1.5‐Tesla MR systems from the same manufacturer. Temperature changes were normalized to SAR values for the head (ΔT/SAR‐H), and the slope of this ΔT/SAR‐H by time relationship was compared between the two scanners. Results The ΔT/SAR‐H for the implant ranged from 3.5 to 5.5 times higher on one MR system as compared to the other ( P < 0.01) depending on the measurement site. Conclusion The findings support previous observations that console‐reported SAR does not constitute a reliable index of heating for elongated, conductive implants, such as the DBS hardware system tested. In contrast to our previous findings using a t/r body coil, the data presented here reveal marked differences between two MR systems using t/r head coils (the coil configuration was consistent with the implant manufacturer's imaging guidelines). J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2006. © 2006 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom