z-logo
Premium
A comparison of K trans measurements obtained with conventional and first pass pharmacokinetic models in human gliomas
Author(s) -
Haroon Hamied A.,
Buckley David L.,
Patankar Tufail A.,
Dow Graham R.,
Rutherford Scott A.,
Balériaux Danielle,
Jackson Alan
Publication year - 2004
Publication title -
journal of magnetic resonance imaging
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.563
H-Index - 160
eISSN - 1522-2586
pISSN - 1053-1807
DOI - 10.1002/jmri.20045
Subject(s) - glioma , pharmacokinetics , correlation , voxel , nuclear medicine , contrast (vision) , magnetic resonance imaging , dynamic contrast , nuclear magnetic resonance , chemistry , medicine , mathematics , physics , radiology , geometry , cancer research , optics
Purpose To compare in a group of patients with cerebral gliomas the estimates of K trans between a conventionally established pharmacokinetic model and a recently developed first pass method. Materials and Methods Glioma patients (23) were studied using T 1 ‐weighted dynamic contrast‐enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and two alternative pharmacokinetic models were used for analysis to derive the volume transfer constant K trans . These were a modified version of the established model (yielding K TK ) and a recently published method based on first pass leakage profile (FP) of contrast bolus (yielding K fp ). Results We found a strong correlation between intra‐tumoral median K TK and K fp (rho = 0.650, P < 0.01), but the values from the conventional model were consistently and significantly higher (mean of inter‐tumoral K fp and K TK medians were 0.018 minute −1 and 0.284 minute −1 , respectively, P < 0.001). The spatial distribution of K TK and K fp showed poor correlation in the presence of large vascular structures and good correlation elsewhere. Conclusion K TK and K fp produce similar biologic information within voxels not dominated by vascular tissue. The FP method avoids erroneous overestimation of K trans in areas of significant intravascular contrast. Findings are in keeping with the predictions of previous mathematical simulations. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2004;19:527–536. © 2004 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom