Premium
MRI of bone tumors: Fast STIR imaging as a substitute for T1‐weighted contrast‐enhanced fat‐suppressed spin‐echo imaging
Author(s) -
Tokuda Osamu,
Hayashi Noriko,
Matsunaga Naofumi
Publication year - 2004
Publication title -
journal of magnetic resonance imaging
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.563
H-Index - 160
eISSN - 1522-2586
pISSN - 1053-1807
DOI - 10.1002/jmri.20031
Subject(s) - bone marrow , nuclear medicine , magnetic resonance imaging , soft tissue , medicine , radiology , fast spin echo , biomedical engineering , pathology
Purpose To compare the usefulness of short inversion recovery (STIR) and T1‐weighted, contrast‐enhanced, fat‐suppressed (T1W‐CEFS) sequences for the evaluation of bone tumors. Materials and Methods Eighteen patients with 19 bone tumors who underwent both STIR and T1W‐CEFS imaging were evaluated. The tumors were categorized in pairs as follows: bone marrow and soft‐tissue components, benign and malignant tumors, and tumors with and without mineralization. The signal difference‐to‐noise ratio (SDNR), signal‐to‐noise ratio (SNR), and tumor volume were calculated in each group. An additional qualitative analysis was performed by means of the ratings of imaging contrast. Results The mean SDNRs of all bone marrow components and bone marrow components without mineralization were significantly higher on fast STIR images than on T1W‐CEFS images ( P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the mean SDNR and SNR of the other group (surrounding soft tissue components, bone marrow components with mineralization, benign and malignant lesions) between fast STIR images and T1W‐CEFS images. The mean volume of the tumors was significantly higher with STIR than with the T1W‐CEFS sequence ( P < 0.05). Conclusion The STIR sequence should be used instead of T1W‐CEFS imaging for the evaluation of bone tumors. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2004;19:475–481. © 2004 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.