Premium
Comparison of conventional fast spin echo, single‐shot two‐dimensional and three‐dimensional half‐fourier RARE for T2‐weighted female pelvic imaging
Author(s) -
Sugimura Hiroshi,
Yamaguchi Kenichiro,
Furukoji Eiji,
Tamura Shozo,
Sakae Tatefumi,
Koga Haruyuki,
Machida Yoshio,
Kitane Shinichi
Publication year - 2004
Publication title -
journal of magnetic resonance imaging
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.563
H-Index - 160
eISSN - 1522-2586
pISSN - 1053-1807
DOI - 10.1002/jmri.20010
Subject(s) - fast spin echo , fourier transform , image quality , medicine , nuclear medicine , pulse sequence , magnetic resonance imaging , radiology , nuclear magnetic resonance , physics , computer science , image (mathematics) , artificial intelligence , quantum mechanics
Purpose To evaluate the usefulness of the three‐dimensional half‐Fourier RARE sequence in comparison with single‐shot two‐dimensional half‐Fourier RARE and conventional fast spin echo (FSE) for female pelvic imaging. Materials and Methods Imaging with all sequences was performed in 146 patients with 166 focal lesions on a 1.5‐T system. The images were compared on the basis of quality, lesion conspicuity, and lesion to the uterus contrast‐to‐noise ratio (CNR). Results The sharpness of intrapelvic organs on the three‐dimensional half‐Fourier RARE sequence was better than that on two‐dimensional half‐Fourier RARE and worse than that on FSE. Motion‐related artifacts for three‐dimensional half‐Fourier RARE were more frequent than those for two‐dimensional half‐Fourier RARE. There was no statistical difference between the three‐dimensional half‐Fourier RARE sequence and FSE in regard to lesion conspicuity and overall image quality. The CNR of leiomyoma to myometrium and cervical cancer to cervical stroma was the highest with three‐dimensional half‐Fourier RARE ( P < 0.05 ). Conclusion The three‐dimensional half‐Fourier RARE sequence generates images with higher contrast and better image resolution than two‐dimensional‐RARE. The three‐dimensional data set provided images that can be observed in any orientation without acquiring an additional scan by using the multiplanar reconstruction (MPR) method. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2004;19:349–355. © 2004 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.