z-logo
Premium
Multipoint dixon technique for water and fat proton and susceptibility imaging
Author(s) -
Glover Gary H.
Publication year - 1991
Publication title -
journal of magnetic resonance imaging
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.563
H-Index - 160
eISSN - 1522-2586
pISSN - 1053-1807
DOI - 10.1002/jmri.1880010504
Subject(s) - dephasing , phase (matter) , encoding (memory) , nuclear magnetic resonance , physics , measure (data warehouse) , point (geometry) , resonance (particle physics) , magnetic resonance imaging , signal (programming language) , mathematics , optics , computer science , atomic physics , geometry , artificial intelligence , quantum mechanics , database , medicine , radiology , programming language
Extensions to a previously described three‐point Dixon magnetic resonance imaging technique are presented that use alternative water/fat phase‐encoding strategies. The technique is generalized to phase encoding of (−θ,0,θ) or (0,θ,2θ) radians, and the signal‐to‐noise ratio (S/N) performance is evaluated. It was found that a θ of 2π/3 radians has optimal S/N but that a θ of π radians is a good compromise and that phase encoding of (O,π, 2π) radians offer an advantage over the previous method, which used (−π, O, π) increments, in that a T2′ (intravoxel susceptibility dephasing) image may be obtained in addition to the usual water, fat, and B 0 images. A new four‐point method with phase encoding of (O, π, 2π, 3π) radians that can also provide a measure of the spectral width of the fat resonance is suggested. The disadvantages of the method are the extra imaging time and low S/N efficiency.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom