Premium
Is half‐dose contrast‐enhanced three‐dimensional MR angiography sufficient for the abdominal aorta and pelvis?
Author(s) -
Takahashi Satoru,
Murakami Takamichi,
Takamura Manabu,
Kim Tonsok,
Hori Masatoshi,
Narumi Yoshifumi,
Nakamura Hironobu
Publication year - 2004
Publication title -
journal of magnetic resonance imaging
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.563
H-Index - 160
eISSN - 1522-2586
pISSN - 1053-1807
DOI - 10.1002/jmri.10443
Subject(s) - abdominal aorta , medicine , aorta , angiography , nuclear medicine , radiology , pelvis , magnetic resonance angiography , gadolinium , contrast (vision) , iliac artery , contrast medium , magnetic resonance imaging , surgery , materials science , artificial intelligence , computer science , metallurgy
Abstract Purpose To evaluate the usefulness of half‐dose contrast‐enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) angiography for depicting the abdominal aorta and its major branches. Materials and Methods A total of 72 consecutive patients were randomly assigned to one of four groups that underwent MR angiography after receiving different concentrations (original or diluted to 50%) and total amounts (single or half‐dose) of gadolinium chelate injected at different rates (1 or 0.5 mL/second). The signal‐to‐noise ratio (SNR) and contrast‐to‐noise ratio (CNR) of the abdominal aorta and of the common and external iliac arteries were calculated, and two blinded readers rated the respective image qualities. Results The SNR and CNR of the abdominal aorta and the common iliac artery in the 0.5 mL/second groups were statistically significantly lower than those in the 1 mL/second groups. The differences in overall image quality across the four groups were not statistically significant. Conclusion Half‐dose MR angiography using diluted contrast medium injected at a rate of 1 mL/second depicted the abdominal aorta and its branches as clearly as using a full single dose. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2004;19:194–201. © 2004 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.