Premium
Functional magnetic resonance cholangiography (fMRC) of the gallbladder and biliary tree with contrast‐enhanced magnetic resonance cholangiography
Author(s) -
Fayad Laura M.,
Holland George A.,
Bergin Diane,
Iqbal Nasir,
Parker Laurence,
Curcillo Paul G.,
Kowalski Thomas E.,
Park Pauline,
Intenzo Charles,
Mitchell Donald G.
Publication year - 2003
Publication title -
journal of magnetic resonance imaging
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.563
H-Index - 160
eISSN - 1522-2586
pISSN - 1053-1807
DOI - 10.1002/jmri.10369
Subject(s) - medicine , cholangiography , magnetic resonance imaging , radiology , gallbladder , bile duct , nuclear medicine
Abstract Purpose To determine the diagnostic performance of functional magnetic resonance cholangiography (fMRC) for the evaluation of anatomic and functional biliary disorders. Materials and Methods At 1.5 T, 39 MR examinations with conventional MRC and mangafodipir trisodium‐enhanced fMRC were retrospectively reviewed by three observers who recorded anatomic (duct dilation, stricture, filling defects) and functional (cholecystitis, obstruction) abnormalities in three modes: MRC alone, fMRC alone, and MRC and fMRC images together (combined‐MRC). Performance was determined by comparing findings with each mode to findings of invasive cholangiography (IC) and surgery. Results Among 75 biliary segments (correlated with IC), the sensitivity/specificity for diagnosing dilation ( N = 41) with MRC was 95%/97%; with fMRC, 90%/100%; with combined‐MRC, 100%/97%. For stricture ( N = 7), the sensitivity/specificity of MRC was 86%/98%; of fMRC, 43%/100%; of combined‐MRC, 86%/100%. For filling defects ( N = 9), the sensitivity/specificity of MRC was 91%/98%; of fMRC, 82%/100%; of combined‐MRC, 91%/100%. For diagnosing obstruction ( N = 9), the sensitivity/specificity of MRC, fMRC, and combined‐MRC were 89%/100%, 100%/100%, and 100%/100%, respectively. For surgically proven cholecystitis ( N = 13), positive predictive values for diagnosing acute/chronic cholecystitis for MRC were 33%/40%; for fMRC, 100%/50%; for combined‐MRC, 100%/50%. Conclusion Although single‐shot fast spin echo (SSFSE)‐MRC is valuable, the addition of fMRC increased diagnostic performance for functional biliary disorders. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2003;18:449–460. © 2003 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.