Premium
Phantom and animal studies of a new hepatobiliary agent for MR imaging: Comparison of Gd‐DTPA‐DeA with Gd‐EOB‐DTPA
Author(s) -
Yoshikawa Kohki,
Inoue Yusuke,
Akahane Masaaki,
Shimada Morio,
Itoh Sayaka,
Seno Atsushi,
Hayashi Sanshin
Publication year - 2003
Publication title -
journal of magnetic resonance imaging
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.563
H-Index - 160
eISSN - 1522-2586
pISSN - 1053-1807
DOI - 10.1002/jmri.10349
Subject(s) - imaging phantom , nuclear medicine , medicine , radiology
Purpose: To investigate the characteristics of Gd‐DTPA‐DeA as a hepatobiliary contrast agent for MR imaging in comparison with those of Gd‐EOB‐DTPA. Materials and Methods: We undertook phantom experiments to assess T1 relaxivity for Gd‐DTPA‐DeA, Gd‐EOB‐DTPA, and Gd‐DTPA in human plasma. For Gd‐DTPA‐DeA and Gd‐EOB‐DTPA, we evaluated the contrast effect in rats using an SPGR sequence. The contrast ratios of liver and abdominal aorta were measured up to 21 minutes after intravenous administration of the agents. Visualization of the bile duct and renal pelvis was also assessed. Results: In human plasma, T1 relaxivity was similar for Gd‐DTPA‐DeA and Gd‐EOB‐DTPA, and higher than those for Gd‐DTPA. Whereas the contrast ratio of liver peaked about five minutes after the injection of Gd‐EOB‐DTPA and was followed by a subsequent decline, a continuous rise was shown for Gd‐DTPA‐DeA, resulting in a larger maximal contrast effect. Contrast ratios of the abdominal aorta were larger for Gd‐DTPA‐DeA. Biliary excretion was observed for both agents but occurred earlier with Gd‐EOB‐DTPA. While renal excretion was shown for all rats three minutes after the injection of Gd‐EOB‐DTPA, it was not observed for Gd‐DTPA‐DeA. Conclusion: Gd‐DTPA‐DeA may be used as a hepatobiliary contrast agent and shows different pharmacokinetics from Gd‐EOB‐DTPA. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2003;18:204–209. © 2003 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.