z-logo
Premium
Precise 3D skeletal kinematics using fast phase contrast magnetic resonance imaging
Author(s) -
Rebmann Andrea J.,
Sheehan Frances T.
Publication year - 2003
Publication title -
journal of magnetic resonance imaging
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.563
H-Index - 160
eISSN - 1522-2586
pISSN - 1053-1807
DOI - 10.1002/jmri.10253
Subject(s) - kinematics , magnetic resonance imaging , computer science , knee joint , phase contrast microscopy , contrast (vision) , nuclear medicine , biomedical engineering , artificial intelligence , physics , medicine , radiology , optics , surgery , classical mechanics
Purpose To examine the precision of cine‐phase contrast (PC) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) techniques as applied to the quantification of three‐dimensional knee joint kinematics. Materials and Methods The knee joints of eight healthy volunteers were studied using three different dynamic, PC MRI protocols: cine‐PC (one average), cine‐PC (two averages), and cine‐PC with segmented phase encoding (fast‐PC). Results Fast‐PC has comparable precision, shorter scan times, and improved subject interexam variability (SIEV) compared to cine‐PC (two averages). Further, cine‐PC (one average) has low precision and high SIEV, making fast‐PC the preferred method of data acquisition. Specifically, the precision of fast‐PC MRI in measuring knee joint kinematics ranged from 0.22°–1.16°. Conclusion A cine‐PC MRI technique utilizing segmented phase encoding (fast‐PC MRI) acquires dynamic data at a faster rate than other PC imaging protocols, without compromising data precision. Being able to acquire precise 3D kinematics with shorter imaging times is critical if we are to use this technique to advance ongoing research in musculoskeletal kinematics. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2003;17:206–213. © 2003 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here