z-logo
Premium
Reproducibility of in vivo metabolite quantification with proton magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging
Author(s) -
Chard Declan T.,
McLean Mary A.,
Parker Geoffrey J.M.,
MacManus David G.,
Miller David H.
Publication year - 2002
Publication title -
journal of magnetic resonance imaging
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.563
H-Index - 160
eISSN - 1522-2586
pISSN - 1053-1807
DOI - 10.1002/jmri.10043
Subject(s) - reproducibility , metabolite , creatine , magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging , in vivo , choline , glutamine , magnetic resonance imaging , nuclear medicine , coefficient of variation , nuclear magnetic resonance , in vivo magnetic resonance spectroscopy , nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy , voxel , chemistry , medicine , biology , radiology , chromatography , physics , biochemistry , microbiology and biotechnology , amino acid
Purpose To investigate intra‐ and interscanner in vivo reproducibility of brain metabolite quantification using 1 H magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging ( 1 H‐MRSI) (PRESS localization, TE = 30 msec, voxel volume = 2.3 mL) and the linear combination model (LCModel). Materials and Methods One subject had a total of nine scans on three occasions at a single site, and three subjects had single scans at two sites. Coefficients of variation (CVs) were estimated using different statistical models applied to intra‐ and interscanner data; therefore, only qualitative comparisons may be made between results. Results CV (intra‐/interscanner) for metabolite quantifications were choline, 12.3%/10.1%; creatine, 9.9%/10.6%; glutamate + glutamine, 15.8%/13.6%; myo‐inositol, 18.5%/14.7%; and N‐acetyl‐aspartate + N‐acetyl‐aspartyl‐glutamate, 6.1%/7.0%. Overall, total intra‐ and intersubject variability was greater than intra‐ and interscanner variability. Conclusion When quantifying metabolic concentrations using the methods employed in this study, biological factors contribute a greater proportion to measurement variability than measurement errors. Using this technique, intra‐ and intersite measurement errors are of the same order. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2002;15:219–225. © 2002 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom