Premium
Comparison of methods for obtaining longitudinal whole‐brain magnetization transfer measurements
Author(s) -
Ostuni John L.,
Richert Nancy,
Wisniewski Ruth,
Lewis Bobbi K.,
Howard Thomas,
Patel Jay,
Frank Joseph A.
Publication year - 2002
Publication title -
journal of magnetic resonance imaging
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.563
H-Index - 160
eISSN - 1522-2586
pISSN - 1053-1807
DOI - 10.1002/jmri.10040
Subject(s) - computer science , image (mathematics) , histogram , artificial intelligence , process (computing) , computer vision , pattern recognition (psychology) , operating system
Abstract Purpose To investigate whether the method of applying image masks can alter quantifiable measures determined from whole‐brain MTR calculations. Materials and Methods Thirty‐five T1/MT image pairs were obtained from five normal volunteers. For each pair a mask was used to specify the regions to be analyzed. Using these regions, a histogram was used to calculate seven global MTR metrics. This process was performed three ways: 1) using a unique mask for each T1/MT pair, 2) sharing a single mask for each subject and registering all intrasubject images to the image corresponding to their mask, and 3) sharing a single mask for each subject and transforming that mask into alignment with each of their original T1/MT image pairs. Results With respect to the first method, the latter two methods caused small but significant differences in several parameters. Conclusion The method of applying image masks can affect whole‐brain MTR values. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2001;15:8–15. Published 2002 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.