z-logo
Premium
Analysis of molecular recognition: Steric electrostatic and hydrophobic complementarity
Author(s) -
NáraySzabó Gábor
Publication year - 1993
Publication title -
journal of molecular recognition
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.401
H-Index - 79
eISSN - 1099-1352
pISSN - 0952-3499
DOI - 10.1002/jmr.300060409
Subject(s) - steric effects , electrostatics , chemistry , hydrophobic effect , chemical physics , van der waals force , static electricity , hydrogen bond , molecular recognition , ionic bonding , complementarity (molecular biology) , computational chemistry , molecule , stereochemistry , organic chemistry , physics , quantum mechanics , ion , biology , genetics
We discuss three important aspects of molecular recognition: steric, electrostatic and hydrophobic. Steric fit means that interacting atoms may not approach each other beyond their van der Waals radii and, simultaneously, crevices should be filled as densely as possible. Electrostatic fit requires the maximum ionic and polar (hydrogen bond or other) interaction between host and guest atoms while the hydrophobic fit corresponds to the association trend between apolar groups in an aqueous medium. Space‐filling models, obtained by molecular graphics, illustrate steric complementarity while we use molecular electrostatic potentials (MEPs) and fields (MEFs) to investigate electrostatic and hydrophobic matching. Molecular regions with negative and positive MEPs attract and repel a positive probe charge, respectively, so we consider them as attracting each other. Furthermore we postulate that regions with MEFs of similar magnitude tend to associate more strongly than those with very different fields ( similis simili gaudet principle). We apply the above rules to the study of complementarity in the tryspin‐BPTI complex and in a crystalline association between styrene epoxide as guest and a comphor‐based anthracene derivative as host. We discuss molecular similarity on the same footing as complementarity and give some examples on the application of the concept of the rationalization of relative strengths of trypsin inhibitors.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here