Premium
Mouse hallucal metatarsal cross‐sectional geometry in a simulated fine branch niche
Author(s) -
Byron Craig D.,
Herrel Anthony,
Pauwels Elin,
Muynck Amelie De,
Patel Biren A.
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
journal of morphology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.652
H-Index - 74
eISSN - 1097-4687
pISSN - 0362-2525
DOI - 10.1002/jmor.20376
Subject(s) - arboreal locomotion , biology , bipedalism , anatomy , primate , habitat , paleontology , ecology
Mice raised in experimental habitats containing an artificial network of narrow “arboreal” supports frequently use hallucal grasps during locomotion. Therefore, mice in these experiments can be used to model a rudimentary form of arboreal locomotion in an animal without other morphological specializations for using a fine branch niche. This model would prove useful to better understand the origins of arboreal behaviors in mammals like primates. In this study, we examined if locomotion on these substrates influences the mid‐diaphyseal cross‐sectional geometry of mouse metatarsals. Thirty CD‐1/ICR mice were raised in either arboreal (composed of elevated narrow branches of varying orientation) or terrestrial (flat ramps and walkways that are stratified) habitats from weaning (21 days) to adulthood (≥4 months). After experiments, the hallucal metatarsal (Mt1) and third metatarsal (Mt3) for each individual were isolated and micro‐computed tomography (micro‐CT) scans were obtained to calculate mid‐shaft cross‐sectional area and polar section modulus. Arboreal mice had Mt1s that were significantly more robust. Mt3 cross sections were not significantly different between groups. The arboreal group also exhibited a significantly greater Mt1/Mt3 ratio for both robusticity measures. We conclude that the hallucal metatarsal exhibits significant phenotypic plasticity in response to arboreal treatment due to habitual locomotion that uses a rudimentary hallucal grasp. Our results support the hypothesis that early adaptive stages of fine branch arboreality should be accompanied by a slightly more robust hallux associated with the biomechanical demands of this niche. J. Morphol. 276:759–765, 2015. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.