Premium
A Qualitative Analysis to Determine the Domains and Skills Necessary to Lead in Public Health
Author(s) -
Grimm Brandon L.,
WatanabeGalloway Shinobu,
Britigan Denise H.,
Schumaker Alice M.
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
journal of leadership studies
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.219
H-Index - 14
eISSN - 1935-262X
pISSN - 1935-2611
DOI - 10.1002/jls.21342
Subject(s) - transformational leadership , leadership development , servant leadership , psychology , public relations , public health , leadership , leadership style , leadership studies , shared leadership , educational leadership , focus group , psychological resilience , medical education , political science , sociology , nursing , pedagogy , medicine , social psychology , anthropology
Leadership programs in public health have been declining in numbers since 2012. The decline in training programs could be due to the lack of outcome‐based results and the lack of a manageable set of standardized skills needed for public health leadership. A comprehensive study was completed in two phases to determine if the current model of public health leadership institutes is effective at generating outcome‐based results. The following paper will focus on the first phase of the study. The first phase included a qualitative analysis to determine the domains, definitions, and skills needed to lead. An analysis of the skills, domains, definitions, and traits included in five established and commonly used leadership models/theories in public health leadership development (Transformational, Servant, Appreciative, Collaborative, and Emotional Intelligence leadership) plus the National Public Health Leadership Development Network ( NLN ) Leadership for Community Health, Safety & Resilience Competency Framework was completed. Of the 161 different skills, definitions, traits, and/or competencies from the five leadership models and the NLN competency framework, 123 were determined to be related to one of six domains needed for leadership and were defined into 21 skills. The findings could lead to more uniformity in public health leadership development and evaluation.