Premium
A Collective Effort to Understand Formalized Program Review
Author(s) -
Sowcik Matthew,
Lindsey Jill L.,
Rosch David M.
Publication year - 2012
Publication title -
journal of leadership studies
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.219
H-Index - 14
eISSN - 1935-262X
pISSN - 1935-2611
DOI - 10.1002/jls.21259
Subject(s) - accreditation , certification , task force , process (computing) , task (project management) , field (mathematics) , value (mathematics) , leadership studies , work (physics) , peer evaluation , engineering ethics , psychology , medical education , computer science , political science , public relations , leadership style , management , medicine , higher education , engineering , mechanical engineering , mathematics , public administration , machine learning , pure mathematics , law , economics , operating system
In response to the growing field of Leadership Studies, the International Leadership Association appointed a task force to explore questions concerning formalized program review systems, such as a peer review process, accreditation, and/or certification. The inquiry involved questions regarding the value of a formalized program review process to advance the field of leadership studies and discover important patterns emerging in areas such as content, teaching, outcomes, and assessment. This article provides a summary of the work completed by the International Leadership Association's Formalized Program Review task force from 2011–2012 to explore and recommend options related to formalized program review for curricular based leadership studies programs.