z-logo
Premium
Complexation behaviour of tin(II) ion with derivative of p‐aminohippuric acid
Author(s) -
Djurdjevic Predrag,
Maksin Tatjana,
Veselinovic Dragan
Publication year - 1994
Publication title -
journal of labelled compounds and radiopharmaceuticals
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.432
H-Index - 47
eISSN - 1099-1344
pISSN - 0362-4803
DOI - 10.1002/jlcr.2580340511
Subject(s) - chemistry , potentiometric titration , tin , yield (engineering) , inorganic chemistry , hippuric acid , ion , stability constants of complexes , electroanalytical method , hydrolysis , ionic bonding , nuclear chemistry , organic chemistry , urine , biochemistry , materials science , metallurgy
Complex formation between tin(II) ion and p‐(biscarboxymethyl)‐aminomethyl‐carbamino‐hippuric acid (PAHIDA) in 0.5 M NaClO 4 ionic medium at 298 K, was studied by means of u.v. spectrophotometry and glass electrode potentiometric titrations. In the concentration range 0.09 ⩽ [Sn] ⩽ 0.150, 0.5 ⩽ [PAHIDA] ⩽ 3.0 (mmol dm −3 ) and 1.30 ⩽ pH ⩽ 6.5, mathematical analysis of potentiometric data, with the aid of general least‐squares programme Superquad, indicates the formation of the following complexes and their respective stability constants (log (β ± σ)): [Sn(H 2 PAHIDA)] (12.98 ± 0.15), [Sn(HPAHIDA)] (9.38 ± 0.05), [Sn(PAHIDA)] (5.74 ± 0.01) and [Sn(OH)PAHIDA] (1.55 ± 0.09) as well as several pure hydrolytic complexes of tin(II). The effect of tin(II)‐PAHIDA complexation on labelling yield of PAHIDA with 99m TcO 4 − was investigated. The optimum yield (90%) was achieved at PAHIDA to tin(II) concentration ratio 30:1 and pH = 5.5.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom