Premium
Language and eyewitness suggestibility
Author(s) -
Alm Charlotte,
Helmy Rehnberg Nora,
Lindholm Torun
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
journal of investigative psychology and offender profiling
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.479
H-Index - 22
eISSN - 1544-4767
pISSN - 1544-4759
DOI - 10.1002/jip.1529
Subject(s) - suggestibility , psychology , eyewitness testimony , cognition , cognitive psychology , eyewitness memory , first language , skepticism , hypnosis , false memory , social psychology , cognitive load , linguistics , recall , epistemology , philosophy , neuroscience , medicine , alternative medicine , pathology
During forensic interviews, eyewitnesses are to retrieve correct information from memory. Cognitive load should be high, leading to risks of giving in to suggestive questions and difficulties in memory retrieval generally. Testifying in a non‐native vs. native language may require even more cognitive effort due to the need to inhibit the interference of the native language. Such witnesses may also be more motivated to appear credible because they often belong to ethnic outgroups relative to forensic professionals, risking more scepticism. In this study, Swedish participants ( N = 51) reported their memory of a simulated crime event either in English (non‐native language) or in Swedish (native language) and were tested for suggestibility and accuracy. Results showed that English‐speaking witnesses yielded to more suggestive questions, perceived themselves as less credible but were equally accurate. Results suggest that testifying in a non‐native language is taxing cognitive resources, in turn increasing suggestibility and suboptimal memory search.