Premium
Pushing lenders to over‐comply with environmental regulations: A developing country perspective
Author(s) -
Kulkarni Parashar
Publication year - 2010
Publication title -
journal of international development
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.533
H-Index - 66
eISSN - 1099-1328
pISSN - 0954-1748
DOI - 10.1002/jid.1587
Subject(s) - incentive , developing country , context (archaeology) , business , multinational corporation , turnover , environmental standard , compliance (psychology) , perspective (graphical) , public economics , empirical evidence , economics , finance , economic growth , political science , microeconomics , computer science , law , biology , psychology , paleontology , social psychology , philosophy , management , epistemology , artificial intelligence
In the past few years, the number of lenders adopting voluntary environmental codes, such as the Equator Principles, is increasing. The main reasons for this form of over‐compliance include warm glow preferences of agents, credit risk and incentives arising from regulation. Empirical evidence suggests that lenders that over‐comply are generally bigger than those that don't. In particular, they are likely to be MNCs. In addition, the behaviour of over‐complying lenders differs from other lenders, for instance they are more likely to incorporate environmental risks in their lending practices. In the context of developing countries, incentives that promote over‐compliance exist to much lesser degree. Analysing the regulatory environment in developing countries, we find no compelling reason for regulators to encourage voluntary initiatives such as the Equator Principles. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.