Open AccessUsing a mixed‐methods approach to adapt an HIV stigma reduction intervention to address intersectional stigma faced by men who have sex with men in Ghana
Author(s) -
Nyblade Laura,
Stockton Melissa A.,
Saalim Khalida,
Rabiu AbuBa'are Gamji,
Clay Sue,
Chonta Mutale,
Dada Debbie,
Mankattah Emmanuel,
Vormawor Richard,
Appiah Patrick,
Boakye Francis,
Akrong Ransford,
Manu Adom,
Gyamerah Emma,
Turner DeAnne,
Sharma Karan,
Torpey Kwasi,
Nelson LaRon E.
Publication year - 2022
Publication title -
journal of the international aids society
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.724
H-Index - 62
ISSN - 1758-2652
DOI - 10.1002/jia2.25908
Subject(s) - men who have sex with men , stigma (botany) , medicine , focus group , curriculum , formative assessment , population , qualitative research , health care , social stigma , family medicine , human immunodeficiency virus (hiv) , medical education , nursing , syphilis , psychology , environmental health , psychiatry , sociology , pedagogy , social science , anthropology , economics , economic growth
Abstract Introduction In Ghana, men who have sex with men (MSM) are estimated to be 11 times more likely to be living with HIV than the general population. Stigmas at the intersection of HIV, same‐sex and gender non‐conformity are potential key drivers behind this outsized HIV disease burden. Healthcare workers (HCWs) are essential to HIV prevention, care and treatment and can also be sources of stigma for people living with HIV and MSM. This article describes the process and results of adapting an evidence‐based HIV stigma‐reduction HCW training curriculum to address HIV, same‐sex and gender non‐conformity stigma among HCWs in the Greater Accra and Ashanti regions, Ghana. Methods Six steps were implemented from March 2020 to September 2021: formative research (in‐depth interviews with stigma‐reduction trainers [ n = 8] and MSM living with HIV [ n = 10], and focus group discussions with HCWs [ n = 8] and MSM [ n = 8]); rapid data analysis to inform a first‐draft adapted curriculum; a stakeholder adaptation workshop; triangulation of adaptation with HCW baseline survey data ( N = 200) and deeper analysis of formative data; iterative discussions with partner organizations for further refinement; external expert review; and final adaptation with the teams of HCWs and MSM being trained to deliver the curriculum. Results Key themes emerging under four immediately actionable drivers of health facility intersectional stigma (awareness, fear, attitudes and facility environment) informed the adaptation of the HIV training curriculum. Based on the findings, existing curriculum exercises were placed in one of four categories: (1) Expand—existing exercises that needed modifications to incorporate deeper MSM and gender non‐conformity stigma content; (2) Generate—new exercises to fill gaps; (3) Maintain—exercises to keep with no modifications; and (4) Eliminate—exercises that could be dropped given training time constraints. New exercises were developed to address gender norms, the belief that being MSM is a mental illness and stigmatizing attitudes towards MSM. Conclusions Getting to the “heart of stigma” requires understanding and responding to both HIV and other intersecting stigma targeting sexual and gender diversity. Findings from this study can inform health facility stigma reduction programming not only for MSM, but also for other populations affected by HIV‐related and intersectional stigma in Ghana and beyond.