Premium
Design and implementation of the infection prevention program into risk management: Managing high level disinfection and sterilization in the outpatient setting
Author(s) -
Sweet Wendy,
Snyder Dayna,
Raymond Matthew
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
journal of healthcare risk management
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.221
H-Index - 16
eISSN - 2040-0861
pISSN - 1074-4797
DOI - 10.1002/jhrm.21407
Subject(s) - medical emergency , audit , medicine , standardization , risk management , infection control , patient safety , health care , risk assessment , operations management , risk analysis (engineering) , nursing , business , intensive care medicine , computer science , computer security , engineering , accounting , finance , economics , economic growth , operating system
Reusable, invasive medical devices within the outpatient setting pose a risk for patient harm. Ineffective disinfection of medical devices can potentially lead to transmission of pathogens between patients; and improper handling can lead to patient injury. A risk assessment was conducted, and the results strongly supported the necessity to develop a robust infection prevention program within the risk management department. This exclusive program was a proactive approach to preventing patient exposure within our healthcare system. Designing and integrating an Infection Prevention program into the Risk Management Department presented challenges, especially with the magnitude of devices and lack of standardization throughout our 33 clinics. Key components of the program included: capturing an accurate inventory of devices throughout the system, hiring a sterile processing expert, engaging support from senior leadership, adhering to rigorous auditing processes, and establishing a staff competency training structure. Since the program was launched 2 years ago, outcomes include: identification of high‐risk practices with immediate resolution, increase in average clinic compliance to device reprocessing standards from 88% to 99%, elimination of 71% of scope reprocessing and 39% of instrument sterilization by clinic staff with allocation to central sterile processing departments, and development of a staff competency training structure.