Premium
Patient, hospital, and geographic disparities associated with comanagement during hospitalization for colorectal cancer surgery
Author(s) -
de Vries Simone,
Jeffe Donna B.,
Pruitt Sandi L.,
Davidson Nicholas O.,
Schootman Mario
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
journal of hospital medicine
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.128
H-Index - 65
eISSN - 1553-5606
pISSN - 1553-5592
DOI - 10.1002/jhm.2161
Subject(s) - medicine , colorectal cancer , comorbidity , emergency medicine , epidemiology , perioperative , cancer , surgery
BACKGROUND Comanagement of surgical patients has increased, but information regarding detailed characteristics of patients receiving comanagement during hospitalization for colorectal cancer (CRC) surgery is lacking. OBJECTIVE To examine the use of and characteristics associated with comanagement of patients hospitalized for CRC surgery. DESIGN This study used a population‐based cross‐sectional design. SETTING We used the linked 2000 to 2005 Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results and Medicare claims data. PATIENTS We included 37,065 patients aged 66 years or older, hospitalized for definitive CRC surgery following stage I to III diagnosis. MEASUREMENTS The outcome of interest was comanagement during hospitalization for CRC surgery, and we examined the association between several patient and hospital characteristics. Comanagement was defined as having a relevant physician (ie, internal medicine hospitalist/generalist) submit a claim for evaluation and management services on 70% or more of the days of hospitalization of the patient. RESULTS During hospitalization for CRC surgery, 27.6% of patients were comanaged, but this percentage varied widely across hospitals (from 1.9% to 83.2%). Several patient and hospital characteristics were associated with the use of comanaged care, of which important characteristics included older age at diagnosis, presence of comorbidity, emergency surgery, and hospital volume. CONCLUSIONS Extensive variability existed in comanagement use across patients and hospitals, likely reflecting the lack of evidence for its clinical effectiveness. Journal of Hospital Medicine 2014;9:226–231. © 2014 Society of Hospital Medicine