Effect of a hospitalist‐run postdischarge clinic on outcomes

BACKGROUND New post‐discharge strategies to reduce adverse events are needed. OBJECTIVE To determine whether follow‐up in a hospitalist‐run post‐discharge clinic (PDC) decreases post‐discharge adverse events when compared to follow‐up in a primary care clinic (PCP) or urgent care clinic (UC). DESIGN Retrospective cohort study using propensity scoring in multivariate analysis. PATIENTS Consecutive Veterans discharged home after a nonscheduled admission seen in PDC, UC, or PCP within 30 days of discharge. INTERVENTIONS Recently discharged patients are seen by housestaff who cared for them during the index admission and staffed with a rotating hospitalist in PDC; UC and PCP patients are seen by housestaff or attending ambulatory physicians. MAIN MEASURES The primary outcome was a composite of hospital readmissions, Emergency Department visits, and mortality 30 days after discharge. KEY RESULTS 5085 patients met criteria; 538 followed up in PDC (10.6%), 1848 with their PCP (36.3%), and 2699 in UC (53.1%). Patients following up in PDC were older and had a higher comorbidity burden. ICU exposure was similar between groups. Patients seen in PDC had shorter length of stay (LOS) (PDC, 3.8 days, UC, 5.0 days, PCP, 6.2 days; p = 0.04) and time to first post‐discharge visit (PDC, 5.0 days, UC, 9.4 days, PCP, 13.7 days; p < 0.01). There were no differences between groups in the primary outcome in unadjusted or propensity‐adjusted multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS Patients seen in a hospitalist‐run PDC had similar 30‐day post‐discharge adverse outcome rates despite a 2.4‐day shorter LOS compared to patients seen by their PCP. Prospective testing of PDCs is warranted. Journal of Hospital Medicine 2014;9:7–12. © 2013 Society of Hospital Medicine