Premium
Impact of clinical history on chest radiograph interpretation
Author(s) -
Test Matthew,
Shah Samir S.,
Monuteaux Michael,
Ambroggio Lilliam,
Lee Edward Y.,
Markowitz Richard I.,
Bixby Sarah,
Diperna Stephanie,
Servaes Sabah,
Hellinger Jeffrey C.,
Neuman Mark I.
Publication year - 2013
Publication title -
journal of hospital medicine
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.128
H-Index - 65
eISSN - 1553-5606
pISSN - 1553-5592
DOI - 10.1002/jhm.1991
Subject(s) - medicine , chest radiograph , pneumonia , pleural effusion , cohen's kappa , radiology , radiography , machine learning , computer science
BACKGROUND The inclusion of clinical information may have unrecognized influence in the interpretation of diagnostic testing. OBJECTIVE The objective of the study was to determine the impact of clinical history on chest radiograph interpretation in the diagnosis of pneumonia. DESIGN Prospective case‐based study. METHODS Radiologists interpreted 110 radiographs of children evaluated for suspicion of pneumonia. Clinical information was withheld during the first interpretation. After 6 months the radiographs were reviewed with clinical information. Radiologists reported on pneumonia indicators described by the World Health Organization (ie, any infiltrate, alveolar infiltrate, interstitial infiltrate, air bronchograms, hilar adenopathy, pleural effusion). SETTING Children's Hospital of Philadelphia and Boston Children's Hospital. PARTICIPANTS Six board‐certified radiologists. OUTCOME MEASURES Inter‐ and inter‐rater reliability were assessed using the kappa statistic. RESULTS The addition of clinical history did not have a substantial impact on the inter‐rater reliability in the identification of any infiltrate, alveolar infiltrate, interstitial infiltrate, pleural effusion, or hilar adenopathy. Inter‐rater reliability in the identification of air bronchograms improved from fair (k = 0.32) to moderate (k = 0.53). Intra‐rater reliability for the identification of alveolar infiltrate remained substantial to almost perfect for all 6 raters with and without clinical information. One rater had a decrease in inter‐rater reliability from almost perfect (k = 1.0) to fair (k = 0.21) in the identification of interstitial infiltrate with the addition of clinical history. CONCLUSIONS Alveolar infiltrate and pleural effusion are findings with high intra‐ and inter‐rater reliability in the diagnosis of bacterial pneumonia. The addition of clinical information did not have a substantial impact on the reliability of these findings. Journal of Hospital Medicine 2013;8:359–364. © 2012 Society of Hospital Medicine