Premium
Firm‐based trial to improve central venous catheter insertion practices
Author(s) -
Miranda Julio A.,
Trick William E.,
Evans Arthur T.,
CharlesDamte Marjorie,
Reilly Brendan M.,
Clarke Peter
Publication year - 2007
Publication title -
journal of hospital medicine
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.128
H-Index - 65
eISSN - 1553-5606
pISSN - 1553-5592
DOI - 10.1002/jhm.168
Subject(s) - medicine , catheter , confidence interval , hospital medicine , internal jugular vein , femoral vein , surgery , intervention (counseling) , emergency medicine , nursing
Abstract BACKGROUND Central venous catheters placed in femoral veins increase the risk of complications. At our institution, residents place most catheters in the femoral vein. OBJECTIVE Determine whether a hands‐on educational session reduced femoral venous catheterization and improved residents' confidence and adherence to recommendations for infection control. DESIGN Firm‐based clinical trial between November 2004 and March 2005. SETTING General medical wards of Cook County (Stroger) Hospital (Chicago, IL), a public teaching hospital. PARTICIPANTS Internal medicine residents (n = 150). INTERVENTION Before their 4‐week rotation, intervention‐firm residents received a lecture and practiced placing catheters in mannequins; control‐firm residents received the usual training. MEASUREMENTS Venous insertion site, adherence to recommendations for infection control, knowledge and confidence about catheter insertion, and catheter‐associated complications RESULTS Residents inserted 54 catheters, or 0.24 insertions per resident per 4‐week rotation. There was a nonsignificant decrease in femoral insertions for nondialysis catheters in the intervention group compared to the control group (44% vs. 58%), difference: −14% (95% CI, −52% to 24%). The intervention significantly increased residents' knowledge of complications related to femoral vein catheterization and temporarily increased their confidence about placing internal jugular or subclavian venous catheters. Intervention‐group residents were more likely to use masks during catheterization (risk ratio, 2.2; 95% CI, 1.3‐2.7), but other practices were similar. CONCLUSIONS Our intervention improved residents' knowledge of complications and use of masks during catheter insertion; however, it did not significantly change venous insertion sites. Catheter insertions on our general medicine wards are infrequent, and the skills acquired during the skills‐building session may have deteriorated given the few clinical opportunities for reinforcement. Journal of Hospital Medicine 2007;2:135–142. © 2007 Society of Hospital Medicine.