z-logo
Premium
Leaf‐Critical and Leaf‐Stable Graphs
Author(s) -
Wiener Gábor
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
journal of graph theory
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.164
H-Index - 54
eISSN - 1097-0118
pISSN - 0364-9024
DOI - 10.1002/jgt.22034
Subject(s) - mathematics , combinatorics , lemma (botany) , chordal graph , pathwidth , indifference graph , 1 planar graph , discrete mathematics , graph , botany , line graph , biology , poaceae
The minimum leaf number ml( G ) of a connected graph G is defined as the minimum number of leaves of the spanning trees of G if G is not hamiltonian and 1 if G is hamiltonian. We study nonhamiltonian graphs with the property l : = ml ( G − v ) = ml ( G ) − 1 for each v ∈ V ( G ) or l : = ml ( G − v ) = ml ( G ) for each v ∈ V ( G ) . These graphs will be called ( l + 1 ) ‐leaf‐critical and l ‐leaf‐stable, respectively. It is far from obvious whether such graphs exist; for example, the existence of 3‐leaf‐critical graphs (that turn out to be the so‐called hypotraceable graphs) was an open problem until 1975. We show that l ‐leaf‐stable and l ‐leaf‐critical graphs exist for every integer l ≥ 2 , moreover for n sufficiently large, planar l ‐leaf‐stable and l ‐leaf‐critical graphs exist on n vertices. We also characterize 2‐fragments of leaf‐critical graphs generalizing a lemma of Thomassen. As an application of some of the leaf‐critical graphs constructed, we settle an open problem of Gargano et al. concerning spanning spiders. We also explore connections with a family of graphs introduced by Grünbaum in correspondence with the problem of finding graphs without concurrent longest paths.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here