Premium
Emissions of carbon dioxide and methane from a headwater stream network of interior Alaska
Author(s) -
Crawford John T.,
Striegl Robert G.,
Wickland Kimberly P.,
Dornblaser Mark M.,
Stanley Emily H.
Publication year - 2013
Publication title -
journal of geophysical research: biogeosciences
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2169-8961
pISSN - 2169-8953
DOI - 10.1002/jgrg.20034
Subject(s) - streams , permafrost , environmental science , hydrology (agriculture) , methane , drainage basin , carbon dioxide , ecosystem , greenhouse gas , soil water , ecology , soil science , geology , oceanography , geography , computer network , geotechnical engineering , cartography , computer science , biology
Boreal ecosystems store significant quantities of organic carbon (C) that may be vulnerable to degradation as a result of a warming climate. Despite their limited coverage on the landscape, streams play a significant role in the processing, gaseous emission, and downstream export of C, and small streams are thought to be particularly important because of their close connection with the surrounding landscape. However, ecosystem carbon studies do not commonly incorporate the role of the aquatic conduit. We measured carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) and methane (CH 4 ) concentrations and emissions in a headwater stream network of interior Alaska underlain by permafrost to assess the potential role of stream gas emissions in the regional carbon balance. First‐order streams exhibited the greatest variability in fluxes of CO 2 and CH 4, and the greatest mean p CO 2 . High‐resolution time series of stream p CO 2 and discharge at two locations on one first‐order stream showed opposing p CO 2 responses to storm events, indicating the importance of hydrologic flowpaths connecting CO 2 ‐rich soils with surface waters. Repeated longitudinal surveys on the stream showed consistent areas of elevated p CO 2 and p CH 4 , indicative of discrete hydrologic flowpaths delivering soil water and groundwater having varying chemistry. Up‐scaled basin estimates of stream gas emissions suggest that streams may contribute significantly to catchment‐wide CH 4 emissions. Overall, our results indicate that while stream‐specific gas emission rates are disproportionately high relative to the terrestrial landscape, both stream surface area and catchment normalized emission rates were lower than those documented for the Yukon River Basin as a whole. This may be due to limitations of C sources and/or C transport to surface waters.