Premium
Impacts of microphysical scheme on convective and stratiform characteristics in two high precipitation squall line events
Author(s) -
Wu Di,
Dong Xiquan,
Xi Baike,
Feng Zhe,
Kennedy Aaron,
Mullendore Gretchen,
Gilmore Matthew,
Tao WeiKuo
Publication year - 2013
Publication title -
journal of geophysical research: atmospheres
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2169-8996
pISSN - 2169-897X
DOI - 10.1002/jgrd.50798
Subject(s) - graupel , weather research and forecasting model , squall line , precipitation , precipitation types , meteorology , environmental science , convection , ice crystals , radar , atmospheric sciences , snow , mesocyclone , rainband , geology , climatology , geography , doppler radar , computer science , telecommunications
This study investigates the impact of snow, graupel, and hail processes on simulated squall lines over the Southern Great Plains in the United States. The Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model is used to simulate two squall line events in Oklahoma during May 2007, and the simulations are validated against radar and surface observations. Several microphysics schemes are tested in this study, including the WRF 5‐Class Microphysics (WSM5), WRF 6‐Class Microphysics (WSM6), Goddard Cumulus Ensemble (GCE) Three Ice (3‐ice) with graupel, Goddard Two Ice (2‐ice), and Goddard 3‐ice hail schemes. Simulated surface precipitation is sensitive to the microphysics scheme when the graupel or hail categories are included. All of the 3‐ice schemes overestimate the total precipitation with WSM6 having the largest bias. The 2‐ice schemes, without a graupel/hail category, produce less total precipitation than the 3‐ice schemes. By applying a radar‐based convective/stratiform partitioning algorithm, we find that including graupel/hail processes increases the convective areal coverage, precipitation intensity, updraft, and downdraft intensities, and reduces the stratiform areal coverage and precipitation intensity. For vertical structures, simulations have higher reflectivity values distributed aloft than the observed values in both the convective and stratiform regions. Three‐ice schemes produce more high reflectivity values in convective regions, while 2‐ice schemes produce more high reflectivity values in stratiform regions. In addition, this study has demonstrated that the radar‐based convective/stratiform partitioning algorithm can reasonably identify WRF‐simulated precipitation, wind, and microphysical fields in both convective and stratiform regions.