z-logo
Premium
Air‐sea CO 2 fluxes in the near‐shore and intertidal zones influenced by the California Current
Author(s) -
Reimer Janet J.,
Vargas Rodrigo,
Smith Stephen V.,
LaraLara Ruben,
GaxiolaCastro Gilberto,
Martín HernándezAyón J.,
Castro Angel,
EscotoRodriguez Martin,
MartínezOsuna Juan
Publication year - 2013
Publication title -
journal of geophysical research: oceans
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2169-9291
pISSN - 2169-9275
DOI - 10.1002/jgrc.20319
Subject(s) - upwelling , intertidal zone , oceanography , shore , submarine pipeline , buoy , pelagic zone , eddy covariance , environmental science , geology , mooring , ecosystem , ecology , biology
The study of air‐sea CO 2 fluxes ( F CO 2 ) in the coastal region is needed to better understand the processes that influence the direction and magnitude of F CO 2 and to constrain the global carbon budget. We implemented a 1 year (January through December 2009) paired study to measure F CO 2 in the intertidal zone (the coastline to 1.6 km offshore) and the near‐shore (∼3 km offshore) off the north‐western coast of Baja California (Mexico); a region influenced by year‐round upwelling. F CO 2 was determined in the intertidal zone via eddy covariance; while in the near‐shore using mooring buoy sensors then calculated with the bulk method. The near‐shore region was a weak annual net source of CO 2 to the atmosphere (0.043 mol CO 2 m −2 y −1 ); where 91% of the outgassed F CO 2 was contributed during the upwelling season. Sea surface temperature (SST) and Δ p CO 2 (from upwelling) showed the strongest relationship with F CO 2 in the near‐shore, suggesting the importance of meso‐scale processes (upwelling). F CO 2 in the intertidal zone were up to four orders of magnitude higher than F CO 2 in the near‐shore. Wind speed showed the strongest relationship with F CO 2 in the intertidal zone, suggesting the relevance of micro‐scale processes. Results show that there are substantial spatial and temporal differences in F CO 2 between the near‐shore and intertidal zone; likely a result of heterogeneity. We suggest that detailed spatial and temporal measurements are needed across the coastal oceans and continental margins to better understand the mechanisms which control F CO 2 , as well as reduce uncertainties and constrain regional and global ocean carbon balances.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom