Premium
Time‐lapse analysis of ambient surface wave anisotropy: A three‐component array study above an underground gas storage
Author(s) -
Riahi Nima,
Bokelmann Götz,
Sala Paola,
Saenger Erik H.
Publication year - 2013
Publication title -
journal of geophysical research: solid earth
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.983
H-Index - 232
eISSN - 2169-9356
pISSN - 2169-9313
DOI - 10.1002/jgrb.50375
Subject(s) - anisotropy , rayleigh wave , isotropy , azimuth , geology , dispersion (optics) , surface wave , rayleigh scattering , phase velocity , orientation (vector space) , love wave , range (aeronautics) , signal (programming language) , seismic anisotropy , seismology , phase (matter) , computational physics , acoustics , optics , physics , longitudinal wave , geometry , wave propagation , materials science , mechanical wave , mathematics , quantum mechanics , computer science , composite material , programming language
We perform a time‐lapse analysis of Rayleigh and Love wave anisotropy above an underground gas storage facility in the Paris Basin. The data were acquired with a three‐component seismic array deployed during several days in April and November 2010. Phase velocity and back azimuth of Rayleigh and Love waves are measured in the frequency range 0.2–1.1 Hz using a three‐component beamforming algorithm. In both snapshots, higher‐surface wave modes start dominating the signal above 0.4 Hz with a concurrent increase in back azimuth ranges. We fit anisotropy parameters to the array detections above 0.4 Hz using a bootstrap approach which also provides estimation uncertainty and enables significance testing. The isotropic phase velocity dispersion for Love and Rayleigh waves match for both snapshots. We also observe a stable fast direction of NNW‐SSE for Love and Rayleigh waves which is aligned with the preferred orientation of known shallow (<300 m) and deeper (∼1000 m) fault systems in the area, as well as the maximum horizontal stress orientation. At lower frequencies corresponding to deeper parts of the basin, the anisotropic parameters exhibit higher magnitude in the November data. This may perhaps be caused by the higher pore pressure changes in the gas reservoir in that depth range.