Premium
Extracting surface wave attenuation from seismic noise using correlation of the coda of correlation
Author(s) -
Zhang Jian,
Yang Xiaoning
Publication year - 2013
Publication title -
journal of geophysical research: solid earth
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.983
H-Index - 232
eISSN - 2169-9356
pISSN - 2169-9313
DOI - 10.1002/jgrb.50186
Subject(s) - coda , attenuation , noise (video) , amplitude , acoustics , ambient noise level , flattening , seismic noise , gradient noise , noise floor , seismology , noise measurement , geology , background noise , physics , noise reduction , optics , computer science , sound (geography) , astronomy , artificial intelligence , image (mathematics)
Extracting surface wave travel time information from the cross‐correlation (CC) of seismic ambient noise has been a great success and remains fast growing. However, it is still challenging to exploit the amplitude content of the noise CC. Although spatial average is able to constrain somewhat meaningful attenuation using noise CC amplitudes, clear bias is observed when spatially varying attenuation is estimated with the traditional noise CC calculation methods. Perhaps the key lies in the development of novel techniques that can mitigate the effect of the uneven distribution of natural noise sources. In this paper, we propose a new method to use the correlation of the coda of correlation of noise (C 3 ) for amplitude measurement. We examine the ability of the method to retrieve surface wave attenuation using data from selected line array stations of the USArray. By comparing C 3 ‐derived attenuation coefficients with those estimated from earthquake data, we demonstrate that C 3 effectively reduces bias and allows for more reliable attenuation estimates from noise. This is probably because of the fact that the coda of noise correlation contains more diffused noise energy, and thus, the C 3 processing effectively makes the noise source distribution more homogeneous. When selecting auxiliary stations for C 3 calculation, we find that stations closer to noise sources (near the coast) tend to yield better signal‐to‐noise ratios. We suggest to preprocess noise data using a transient removal and temporal flattening method, to mitigate the effect of temporal fluctuation of the noise source intensity, and to retain relative amplitudes. In this study, we focus our analysis on 18 s measurements.