z-logo
Premium
A comparison between resonant and nonresonant heating at EISCAT
Author(s) -
Bryers C. J.,
Kosch M. J.,
Senior A.,
Rietveld M. T.,
Singer W.
Publication year - 2013
Publication title -
journal of geophysical research: space physics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2169-9402
pISSN - 2169-9380
DOI - 10.1002/jgra.50605
Subject(s) - atomic physics , electron , ionization , ionosphere , ion , physics , joule heating , incoherent scatter , electric field , ohmic contact , electron temperature , f region , materials science , computational physics , geophysics , nuclear physics , electrode , quantum mechanics
We compare the height‒integrated electron heating rates from O‒ and X‒mode HF pump waves to extract the components due to resonant and nonresonant heating mechanisms in the ionosphere. We present results from a November 2011 campaign in Norway, using the European Incoherent Scatter (EISCAT) heater facility and UHF radar. We show that the theoretical nonresonant, ohmic heating due to the electromagnetic pump wave electric field agrees with observations for X‒mode pumping. For O‒mode pumping, the observed height‒integrated heating rate exceeds the theoretical ohmic electron heating rate by a factor of 2–5, the excess being attributed to resonant heating mechanisms. In addition, a persistent UHF ion‒line enhancement is observed for O‒mode and, more unusually, X‒mode pumping. We attribute the latter to O‒mode leakage in the X‒mode pulse. For O‒mode, we see a descent in altitude of the ion‒line enhancement and show that this is most likely due to ionization from pump‒induced fluxes of suprathermal electrons. We estimate the ionization rate and determine an enhanced electron flux showing that approximately 10–20% of the pump power is transferred to high energy suprathermal electrons.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here