Premium
Use of internally nuclease‐protected single‐strand DNA oligonucleotides and silencing of the mismatch repair protein, MSH2, enhances the replication of corrected cells following gene editing
Author(s) -
Papaioannou Ioannis,
Disterer Petra,
Owen James S.
Publication year - 2009
Publication title -
the journal of gene medicine
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.689
H-Index - 91
eISSN - 1521-2254
pISSN - 1099-498X
DOI - 10.1002/jgm.1296
Subject(s) - oligonucleotide , biology , transfection , microbiology and biotechnology , electroporation , msh2 , gene , dna mismatch repair , dna repair , genetics
Background Gene editing is potentially a powerful technology for introducing genetic changes by using short single‐stranded DNA oligonucleotides (ssODNs). However, their efficiency is reduced by the mismatch repair system, especially MSH2, which may suppress gene editing, although findings vary depending on readout and type of oligonucleotide used. Additionally, successfully edited cells are reported to arrest at the S‐ or G2‐phase. In the present study, we evaluate whether a novel ssODN design and down‐regulation of MSH2 expression allows the isolation of replicating gene‐edited cells. Methods Cultured Chinese hamster ovary cells expressing mutated enhanced green fluorescent protein were targeted with ssODNs of varying design, all capable of restoring fluorescence, which allows the monitoring of correction events by flow cytometry. Converted cells were isolated by cell sorting and grown to determine colony formation efficiencies. MSH2 expression was suppressed with small interfering RNA and the cell cycle distribution of cells transfected with ssODN was quantified by flow cytometry, following propidium iodide or DRAQ5 staining. Results Although efficiency was higher using ssODN end‐protected with phosphorothioate, the potential of edited cells to form colonies was lower than those targeted with unmodified ssODN. We established that ssODN transfection itself perturbs the cell cycle and that MSH2 gene silencing increases correction efficiency. In both cases, however, the effect was dependent on the positioning of the protected nucleotides. Importantly, when internally protected ssODN was used in combination with MSH2 suppression, a higher proportion of G1‐phase corrected cells was observed 48–64 h after transfection. Conclusions Use of internally protected ssODN and downregulating cellular MSH2 activity may facilitate isolation of viable, actively replicating gene‐edited cells. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.